Thursday, July 20, 2006

seattle needs help

last weekend beth and i joined nathan, telia, steve, and trisha at the nurmi cottage on cypress island. it was a lazy weekend. we soaked in the fire-fed hot tub, tempted deer with wheat bread, and ventured guesses about the upcoming seahawks season. and, between us two teachers, one engineer, one editor, one mfa coordinator, and one divinity student turned environmental conservationist, we solved the problems of life: the middle east, the education system, the schism between catholics and lutherans--easy as pie.

unfortunately, our informal council met one week too early. on tuesday, seattle sonics owner (or former owner) howard schultz announced the sale of the seattle super sonics to oklahoma entrepreneur clayton bennet. the general consensus is that this will spell the end of seattle basketball. despite promising seattle a one-year window for negotiating a new lease deal, bennet is well-known for his attempts at wrangling oklahoma city an nba team. pundits guess that clay's rhetoric is most likely a laundry list of sugar-coated lies. so, how to mend chasm between (new) sonics ownership and our tight-fisted seattle council? if only we could convene an emergency session of the cypress island sextet.

okay, this is a bit over dramatic, but to a sports fan, the loss of a home team is a little like the death of a friend. in some (shallow) way it's even worse -- few feel sympathetic for a fan and his (or her) dearly departed sports team, especially in seattle.

i really don't belong here. seattle is a fine city for liberals and zombies, but i'm neither liberal nor zombie. well, perhaps a liberal conservative, but definitely not a zombie. sorry, i should use that 'z' term with more discretion, but i'm a bit overcome by the strength of the anti-sonics. it seems that everywhere i surf, people are shouting 'good riddance!' they sputter the same million dollar logic back at one another, the same nonsense about pro-athlete salaries (yes, a million-a-month is absurd, but protesting dwyane wade's contract is a bit like telling the sun to go down), and the same complaints about the win-loss record. and the funny thing is, i might just be a zombie after all--i really can't shout back. their logic is hardly foolproof, but i'm too stunned to fight. i can't believe they don't care like i do.

i guess we're all zombies in one way or another, but it's funny that i never noticed. why is it that five guys in baggy shorts and tank tops can engineer such ardor? aurora has a prostitution problem, why am i not bothered that everyone just pretends that all is well? as a christian, shouldn't i be bothered by the fact that seattle has one of the lowest church attendance rates in the country? what is it about those guys in green? what does this say about me?

i'm not sure how to answer my questions. as usual, i'll have to think about it. in the meantime, i'll let you read a form letter from the man that's the most important of all of the anti-sonic zombies, city council president nick licata. if you don't recall, he's the man that once proclaimed the sonics to be of no cultural value AT ALL to seattle. anyway, he was kind enough to reply to my email.

and for you one or two folks that share the sonics sadness, here's a site that's attempting to garner support for a sonics future in seattle (or bellevue).



andrew david and mystery employee. "ess-a-bagel bill" nyc, ny. at first bill seemed like your stereotypical new yorker--gruff, and sarcastic. but then a delightful sweetness broke through his rough exterior. in fact, i bet he's a closet seattle sonics fan. anyway, he wanted us to take the 2nd picture and then send it to him. i'm still working on that last part...

3 comments:

andrew said...

ERRATUM
upon reading my post this morning i noticed several spaces where i made less sense than usual.

unless you were on cypress island, you probably don't know what i mean when i talk of solving the world's problems. it may be unclear that i'm halfway kidding.

and if i were to rewrite the post, i'd explain a bit more (or for the first time) about what i mean by zombies. at present it's a little bizarre and quite vague. that's mostly because i never intended to talk about zombies. you may not believe me, but that first sentence once said "seattle is a fine city for liberals and GRIZZLIES."

also, it may have been more convincing to give reasons that the anti-sonics are not foolproof (e.g., 100 million dollars is hardly anything in contrast to the entire seattle city budget; bribing businesses, take boeing for example, with money is rather common practice; etc.) instead of just saying it that way.

and who cares about church attendance? maybe claiming that seattle has less jesus-lovers per capita may have been more meaningful. are in the pacific northwest.

Richard Simmons said...

I'll miss those Sonics too Andrew - and I don't even live in Seattle.

But when I'm sad, I like to JAZZer-size. You should try it. It keeps the zombies away.

Your friend,

Richard

andrew said...

richard,

i'm happily surprised to find an out-of-towner who expresses any care at all for the sonics. would you be willing to lend your fame and fortune toward the save-the-sonics cause?

regardless, thanks for the recommendation. maybe i'll try that.